The Misdiagnosis Initiative: An Interview with Dr. James Webb
Note: This is a cross-post from the Global #gtchat Powered by the Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented blog. As moderator of #gtchat, this interview was conducted to raise awareness of the issue of misdiagnosis.
Dr. Webb, thank you for taking the time to talk to us about this important issue to the gifted community. Parents and
educators of gifted and twice-exceptional children have long struggled with the
consequences of misdiagnosis and how to approach their health
care professionals about the matter.
Moderator: What
is The Misdiagnosis Initiative and why did SENG decide to promote it at this
time?
Dr. Webb: The Misdiagnosis Initiative is
SENG’s latest effort to make parents and professionals aware of the possibility
that gifted children and adults may be misdiagnosed as having ADHD, Asperger’s
OCD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Bipolar, or other behavioral disorders, and
that many of them may be placed inappropriately on medication. Additionally, SENG
is raising awareness concerning twice-exceptional gifted children—i.e., those
who are gifted yet do, in fact, have a disorder. In these cases, it is usually
the person’s disability that is emphasized, and the gifted aspects are too
often overlooked.
In addition to informing parents,
SENG is making concerted efforts to reach health-care professions, such as
pediatricians, family practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, clinical
social workers, etc., because extremely few of these professionals have
received any training about the characteristics of gifted children and adults
and how these characteristics can result in behaviors that are mistaken for
disorders or that have implications for disorders.
SENG’s Misdiagnosis Initiative,
which really has been going on for several years, has several components:
·
Producing a brochure titled “Decreasing Medical
Misdiagnosis in Gifted Children,” available from SENG both in English and in
Spanish to give to health-care professionals. This brochure is available in
print or as a free Internet download from SENG and nearly 10,000 copies have been distributed.
·
Producing bookmarks for parents of gifted
children, available free from SENG, that list Internet and book resources. To
date, over 30,000 have been distributed.
·
Featuring a brief video now on YouTube,
developed a few years ago by SENG, on misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted
children that has been viewed over 28,000 times.
·
Highlighting a video of a Grand Rounds lecture on misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses that I did at the
University of Wisconsin Medical School that has been watched over 7,800 times.
·
Drawing attention to the book Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted
Children and Adults, which has sold over 35,000 copies.
·
Conducting Continuing Education classes on this
topic for psychologists and other counseling and health care professionals.
·
Establishing communication with the American
Academy of Pediatrics to encourage them to incorporate characteristics of
gifted children into their diagnostic guidelines for disorders such as ADHD.
·
Writing, and encouraging others to write,
articles in general media as well as for professional publications in order to
bring attention to this neglected area.
·
Conducting a nationwide survey of parents of
gifted children to ascertain their experiences with physicians who see their
gifted children.
Although these activities may seem like a lot, they do not
come close to accomplishing the task and are really just the beginning. We
continue to hear horror stories of gifted children who are overlooked,
neglected, misunderstood, misdiagnosed, and inappropriately treated. Because of
this, SENG is actively seeking funding from various foundations to continue and
expand the Misdiagnosis Initiative.
Moderator: Last
year, SENG sent a letter to the American Academy of Pediatrics questioning why
their diagnostic guidelines fail to mention the possibility that a child’s
intellectual giftedness may contribute to symptoms similar to ADHD. What was
their response?
Dr.Webb: When the American Academy of Pediatrics lowered the
recommended age for diagnosing ADD/ADHD from age 6 to age 4, it caught our
attention, particularly since there was no mention of the need to consider
gifted child behaviors. In November 2011, we wrote a letter to the American
Academy of Pediatrics, and follow up contact was made primarily by Marianne
Kuzujanakis, M.D., MPH, who is not only a Harvard trained pediatrician, but
also a SENG Board member and parent of a highly gifted child. (See her article at the Huffington Post here.) At the time, I
frankly thought that despite her credentials the American Academy of Pediatrics
would brush us aside. I am happy to say that they did not. What is emerging is
a continuing dialogue with AAP about how SENG might help to inform
pediatricians about issues regarding gifted children. This dialogue has also
resulted in several publications on the topic in pediatric journals,
and we are optimistic that this increased attention will continue.
We are also hoping to have similar dialogues with the
American Psychiatric Association. However, we have delayed this partly because
we are such a small group attempting a very large task, and also because we are
awaiting the arrival of DSM-5 to see what changes have been made and the
implications those changes will have for the issues of misdiagnosis and dual
diagnoses of gifted children and adults.
Moderator: Mental
disorders are generally diagnosed solely on the basis of observable behaviors
reported by parents, teachers, school counselors, etc. Are pediatricians the
best personnel to diagnose ADHD/ADD and other disorders often confused with
gifted behavior; especially in young children? Who would be a better
alternative for parents of gifted children to seek out for a diagnosis?
Dr. Webb: Psychologists, in my experience, are generally the best at
making an accurate diagnosis of ADD/ADHD—particularly if they are
neuropsychologists who are also knowledgeable about gifted children.
Regrettably, there are not a lot of these professionals around the country. The
next best will be pediatricians, if for no other reason than that they often
have a very long standing relationship with the child and the child’s family. It
is important, however, for parents to appreciate how difficult it can be for a
pediatrician to make such a diagnosis; the typical office visit is often only
15 to 20 minutes, and the physician must rely on short child observation and
rating scale information provided by teachers or parents. Parents must
recognize, too, that these brief rating scales were not developed for gifted
children.
Whether you seek help from a physician or a psychologist, it is particularly important to find
someone who will not see gifted behaviors as necessarily representing
behavioral disorders. Parents should openly ask the psychologist or
physician about prior knowledge and experience with gifted children or adults,
and perhaps about SENG’s Misdiagnosis Initiative. Giving the professional a
copy of SENG’s brochure can help, too, or perhaps even a copy of the book, Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted
Children and Adults. If you and your child have a good relationship with
the treating professional, and if the professional is open to considering
gifted behaviors and treats the child with intellectual respect, then you
probably are in a good situation.
Moderator: How
do gifted characteristics put children at risk for misdiagnosis?
Dr.Webb: Perhaps the biggest risk comes
from the gifted child’s high level of intensity and sensitivity. However, these characteristics, often
referred to as “overexcitabilities,” are not necessarily problems. Most often,
the problems come because such a child is inappropriately placed in an
educational system (e.g., spending large amounts of time waiting for others to
catch up), or is criticized by his family members who do not understand that
the behaviors are characteristics of gifted children (e.g., “Do you have to
question everything?” or “You are just stubborn and strong willed!”), or the
child has substantial difficulty relating to her age peers (“Why do you have to
be so bossy” or “Why don't you want to play with the other children?”). When a
bright, intense, and sensitive gifted child is put in such an ill-fitting and
unsupportive situation, the result often are problematic behaviors. However,
these behaviors are not indicators of emotional problems.
Some years ago, the educator May Seagoe composed a list of characteristics of gifted children. On the left side, she wrote the strength that derived from that characteristic. On the right side, she wrote potential problems that could arise from that very same characteristic. For example, a strength might be that the child acquires information quickly; a related problem area might be that the child is impatient with others who do not learn as rapidly. Or perhaps the child has high energy (a strength), but also his frustration with inactivity may lead him to interrupt others (a problem). I would be pleased to provide a chart of these if people would email me at jwebb@greatpotentialpress.com, or you can find them here.
Because of the high energy level
of gifted children, ADHD is perhaps the most common misdiagnosis, and parents
might find it helpful to look at how behaviors of gifted children can be
similar to those of ADHD. For this, I often recommend that they look at a brief
article titled “ADHD and Children Who Are Gifted”
Moderator: What
practical strategies can you offer to parents who suspect their children may
have been misdiagnosed?
Dr. Webb: Here are some general guidelines
that may help parents in their initial thinking as to whether the behaviors are
gifted or behavior disorder.
·
Does the developmental history indicate early
developmental milestones or precocious development?
·
Are the behavior patterns typical ones for
gifted children or adults?
·
Are the problem behaviors only found in certain
situations or contexts, rather than across situations?
·
Are the problematic behaviors reduced when the
person is with other gifted persons or in intellectually supportive settings?
·
Are the problematic behaviors most easily
explained as stemming from a gifted/creative person being in an inappropriate
situation?
·
Are the behaviors ones that truly cause an
impairment in personal or social functioning, or are they simply quirks or
idiosyncrasies that cause little discomfort or impairment?
If you answered yes to any of these six questions, you
should mention this to the diagnosing professional. You may also want to get
more specific and detailed information from a free SENG article at http://www.sengifted.org/archives/articles/misdiagnosis-and-dual-diagnosis-of-gifted-children,
or from the book Misdiagnosis and Dual
Diagnosis of Gifted Children and Adults. I would also encourage parents to
consider getting a second opinion. Second opinions have been a valued tradition
in medicine for many decades, and they are equally valid with regard to
behavior problems as well.
Moderator: What
resources are available to parents of gifted children to assist them in talking
to their healthcare providers?
Dr. Webb: I encourage parents to use all of the resources that I have
listed in the SENG Misdiagnosis Initiative above. Additionally, parents may
wish to look at Hoagies' Gifted Education Page which provides not only highly relevant and informative articles, but also
there is a list of psychologists who have been recommended by other parents.
Moderator: Dr.
Webb, you have dedicated your professional career to help gifted children and
their parents recognize misdiagnosis. What initially influenced you to pursue
this path?
Dr. Webb: We founded SENG in 1981 at the Wright State University
School of Professional Psychology, after the suicide of a highly gifted
teenager who had not received mental health help sufficient to alleviate his
misery and depression. After his death, his parents contacted us and asked us
to begin a program, and in addition to establishing parent discussion support
groups, we also provided testing and counseling to families of gifted children.
Soon, we began to notice a significant number of gifted children who had been
diagnosed as having ADHD. As we studied them, we determined that many of these
children did not have ADHD. Instead, they were bright, intense, sensitive
children, most of whom were educationally misplaced and understimulated, who
often were not able to relate to their age peers, and who were in power
struggles with adults because they were so strong willed.
I reflected on how much training I had received in my own
doctoral graduate training program in psychology. I realized that I had
received only about 60 minutes worth of lecture on the subject, with the
professor focusing on the Lewis Terman studies as an example of longitudinal
research. I also remembered one of my professors saying to me that “In testing,
once a child scores above 130, you can stop testing because it really doesn't make much difference after that” and “Bright children are far less likely to
have social, emotional, and behavioral problems.” Since I was now involved in
the training of clinical psychologists, I began asking other psychologists, as
well as other healthcare professionals, how much training they received about
gifted children and adults. I discovered that they had either received none at
all, or they had received about the same as I had.
Clearly, in my mind, there was a need to educate other
professionals. So, I began to give class lectures to my doctoral students, and
I began writing professionally about the topic. Through SENG, I began
conducting classes in continuing education for psychologists, and gradually
other professionals have begun to pick up on this area.
Moderator: We at Global #gtchat believe strongly that awareness and dissemination
of information is critical to combat the misdiagnosis of gifted children and
adults. There will be a special Twitter chat at #gtchat on Friday, May 10th
at 7PM EDT concerning the Misdiagnosis Initiative from SENG.
Comments
Post a Comment