Instructional Strategies for Higher Order Thinking
Earlier this year, I wrote a post on Instructional
Strategies for Gifted Students. To date, it has been the most read post on this
blog. An interesting comment on that post came from a teacher, “How do teachers
find the time to coordinate the differentiation required to meet all students'
needs? Any suggestions?” This is a very
important question as well as a very ‘telling’ question with regard to the
state of teaching today. And, as a matter of fact, I do have some suggestions.
Differentiating for every student in a class of 30 or more
students is no easy task. In fact, I think it’s safe to say that this rarely
occurs in the majority of classrooms regardless of mandates. But is there a
better way to meet the needs of every child without having to write 30
different lesson plans?
Parents of gifted students need to be cognizant of these
types of issues in education because invariably it will affect your child if
you choose to keep them in public education … and most of you will. So, what
can a parent do to ensure that their own child’s needs are being met and that
they are being challenged to meet their full potential?
Enter Higher Order Thinking as an instructional strategy. And
what exactly is Higher Order Thinking? I like to ‘think’ of it as thinking
beyond the test … thinking beyond rote memorization or simply retelling
previously learned material. One needs to understand
what they are learning and then connect their thoughts in meaningful ways to
solve problems. Sounds good to me! One caveat though … there are many educators
who strongly believe that Higher Order Thinking has no place in the classroom;
that it is not a function of education.
This all begs the question … who teaches your child? Is it
just the regular education teacher? The gifted education teacher? What about
you? You have a responsibility to teach your child as well. Therefore, you need
to know about Higher Order Thinking and how it can be taught both in your
child’s classroom and at home.
Alice Thomas, M.Ed., and Glenda Thorne, Ph.D., in their
article, “Higher Order Thinking” here, state that Higher Order Thinking
skills can be learned and that skill levels can be increased. And the best
strategy for both teachers and parents is modeling! This may require some
knowledge acquisition on your part. Thinking about thinking, metacognition, is
an intricate part of Higher Order Thinking. Understanding how you think can
improve how you think. Therefore, one way to model Higher Order Thinking is to
explain to your children why you think the way you do. Make sense?
In her piece for Edutopia, “Ten Takeaway Tips for Teaching
Critical Thinking” here, Mariko Nobori provides teachers with some
excellent strategies for teaching students to think at a higher level which
include embedding questions in their lessons, prompting students with
provocative questions, providing tools such as “sentence starters and
connectors”, modeling expectations, encouraging constructive controversy, choosing
topics that interest students, employing Socratic discussions, using different
methods of assessment, allowing students to evaluate each other, and letting
students lead the discussion. Parents can use these techniques as well in their
everyday interactions with their gifted child.
Why is this so important? In 2008, Tony Wagner wrote the
book, The Global Achievement Gap, in which he details the dangers
inherent in failing to educate our children to become critical thinkers with
the ability to solve ever-increasingly difficult global problems. In the 21st
century, employers put a premium on workers who have these skills and can
effectively use them. Parents, too, need to put a premium on these skills for
their children to become effective problem solvers. Innovation and creativity
are both enhanced by Higher Order Thinking as an integral part of the process.
Higher Order Thinking as a teaching strategy encompasses a
student’s world both in and out of the classroom. It can be used by both
teachers and parents. Its effective use can overcome the brain’s natural
inclination to limit incoming information and can encourage our children to
become open to creative thought processes and new ideas.
Good post. But who are these educators you quote " who strongly believe that Higher Order Thinking has no place in the classroom; that it is not a function of education." I really would like to write to them and point out the obvious.
ReplyDeleteHOT skills are the natural extension of the LOT skills, indeed, HOTs are what make LOTs meaningful. Educators who do not place HOTs within the classroom need to know they are an endangered species because knowledge can be acquired anywhere. Knowledge is important - but what one does with it is even more important.
It's not a pleasant thought to think gifted children have yet another hurdle to get over.
Thanks for the comment Peter. Who are these educators? They are those who teach to the test because they are given no choice to do otherwise. Federal funding is based on AYP - Annual Yearly Progress - in the U.S. Here are a few references to this unpleasant situation ... http://educationvisionleadership.edublogs.org/2010/11/27/critical-thinking-skills-are-critical/ and http://www.districtadministration.com/article/effective-instructional-strategies and http://fairtest.org/facts/howharm.htm (4th paragraph)
ReplyDeleteDuh! Yes of course. Thanks for the links. I recall a post somewhere from a man who worked for a testing company (in the US) lamenting what companies like his were doing to education - unfortunately the mortgage payments seemed more important.
ReplyDeleteYou were probably being generous is calling them 'educators'.
Thanks again.